Here’s how Dems can + must do more than wait for an election. Let’s start w/ why: - 7 of the 9 justices were appointed by a party that hasn’t won a popular vote more than once in 30 years - 1 of those seats was stolen - Several lied to Congress to secure their appointment…
6,587
45,659
5,700
229,252
- 1 justice’s family (Thomas) was paid by right wing groups for years and he never disclosed it, violating Federal law - Same justice’s spouse participated in 1/6 and he used his SCOTUS seat to vote to keep potential info related to his wife from investigators in Congress…
633
11,559
300
83,224
- 2 justices stand very credibly accused of sexual assault And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Election or not, the Supreme Court has a legitimacy crisis and the public reaffirms it: 75% of the US public reports lacking confidence in SCOTUS, & those numbers were *pre-Roe ruling*
702
7,876
177
68,124
In a legitimacy crisis, the solution Biden + Dem leaders must offer can’t just be one of voting, but of statute & authority. Compared to Exec + Leg branch, checks on Court overreach and misconduct are little to none. Leaders must share their plans for Roe AND a rogue court.
270
7,170
212
59,221
Past Presidents, from Lincoln to FDR, understood the dangerous stakes of allowing an unchecked Court overreach its authority and threaten our democracy. Lincoln ignored the court to issue the emancipation proclamation. FDR, in the plunges of the Great Depression, also sought…

Jun 25, 2022 · 5:56 PM UTC

265
6,091
155
53,624
to confront the Court’s structure (and core gerontocracy problem of lifetime appointments) via public appeal. While he did not succeed, that check came from the ppl & Congress, NOT scotus. The ruling is Roe, but the crisis is democracy. Leaders must share specific plans for both
186
4,993
94
50,842
The President & Dem leaders can no longer get away with familiar tactics of “committees” and “studies” to avoid tackling our crises head-on anymore: - Restrain judicial review - Open clinics on federal lands - Court expansion - Expand Fed access/awareness of pill abortions - etc
670
9,667
544
67,980
For the moments when we DO insist on elections, we must be PRECISE with what we need and we will do with that power: How many seats does the party need to Codify Roe? Dems must SAY THAT. Not just “go vote” or “give us $6 to win.” That is demoralizing, losing, unfocused nonsense
893
14,678
1,000
95,518
Dem leaders must tell voters the plan: What’s the *actual* need? Which specific seats are we focused on? WHAT votes do we need & WHERE (what states + races?) And, what’s the return? What is Biden/Congress ACTUALLY willing+able to do at 52/60 seats? Be honest. Details motivate
901
10,773
720
79,727
So let’s wake up everybody! What’s good Democrats! If you don’t like what I’ve laid out here, then please present YOUR plan instead of little “why we can’t” lists!! Let’s cut the handwringing and get moving! Chop chop! No more showtunes till November unless it’s for GOTV!!
2,338
9,205
530
87,902
Replying to @AOC
Not that I disagree with most of your plan, but overturning Roe is not court overreach. It's a court decision about another court decision - not overturning legislation or anything to do with other branches.
12
2
30
It’s overreach. It’s rolling back basic due process rights for half the country, maybe more. Thomas’s concurring opinion targets the entire doctrine of substantive due process.
5
3
69
Replying to @AOC
They were correct. Because the courts overstepped the legislative branch to originally pass Roe v Wade. So technically they are doing the right thing by giving the power back to the voters.
5
1
29
So, it's up to voters to decide what rights women have state by state? That's insane.
6
1
26
Replying to @AOC @MelanieMoore
As the Constitution does NOT specify the total of SCOTUS justices,& as the current 9 were based on one per Federal District Appeals Courts & there are now 13, there should be equal number of SCOTUS justices. @POTUS NAME 4 MORE JUSTICES with annual rotating Chief Justice role
5
21
1
117