Here’s how Dems can + must do more than wait for an election. Let’s start w/ why: - 7 of the 9 justices were appointed by a party that hasn’t won a popular vote more than once in 30 years - 1 of those seats was stolen - Several lied to Congress to secure their appointment…
6,670
46,069
5,698
230,337
- 1 justice’s family (Thomas) was paid by right wing groups for years and he never disclosed it, violating Federal law - Same justice’s spouse participated in 1/6 and he used his SCOTUS seat to vote to keep potential info related to his wife from investigators in Congress…
640
11,686
300
83,677
- 2 justices stand very credibly accused of sexual assault And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Election or not, the Supreme Court has a legitimacy crisis and the public reaffirms it: 75% of the US public reports lacking confidence in SCOTUS, & those numbers were *pre-Roe ruling*
707
7,965
177
68,516
In a legitimacy crisis, the solution Biden + Dem leaders must offer can’t just be one of voting, but of statute & authority. Compared to Exec + Leg branch, checks on Court overreach and misconduct are little to none. Leaders must share their plans for Roe AND a rogue court.
274
7,241
212
59,554
Past Presidents, from Lincoln to FDR, understood the dangerous stakes of allowing an unchecked Court overreach its authority and threaten our democracy. Lincoln ignored the court to issue the emancipation proclamation. FDR, in the plunges of the Great Depression, also sought…
273
6,157
155
53,932
to confront the Court’s structure (and core gerontocracy problem of lifetime appointments) via public appeal. While he did not succeed, that check came from the ppl & Congress, NOT scotus. The ruling is Roe, but the crisis is democracy. Leaders must share specific plans for both
188
5,041
94
51,123
The President & Dem leaders can no longer get away with familiar tactics of “committees” and “studies” to avoid tackling our crises head-on anymore: - Restrain judicial review - Open clinics on federal lands - Court expansion - Expand Fed access/awareness of pill abortions - etc
677
9,776
544
68,373
For the moments when we DO insist on elections, we must be PRECISE with what we need and we will do with that power: How many seats does the party need to Codify Roe? Dems must SAY THAT. Not just “go vote” or “give us $6 to win.” That is demoralizing, losing, unfocused nonsense
902
14,805
1,000
96,010
Dem leaders must tell voters the plan: What’s the *actual* need? Which specific seats are we focused on? WHAT votes do we need & WHERE (what states + races?) And, what’s the return? What is Biden/Congress ACTUALLY willing+able to do at 52/60 seats? Be honest. Details motivate

Jun 25, 2022 · 5:57 PM UTC

909
10,891
720
80,144
So let’s wake up everybody! What’s good Democrats! If you don’t like what I’ve laid out here, then please present YOUR plan instead of little “why we can’t” lists!! Let’s cut the handwringing and get moving! Chop chop! No more showtunes till November unless it’s for GOTV!!
2,361
9,315
529
88,354
Replying to @AOC
the issue is that being honest would reveal the fact that they don't care to do anything about this issue because if they did they would have done something when Obama had the votes to codify roe v wade 8 years ago
14
3
69
BHO had 60 in the Senate for about 2 months: after Franken came in and before Kennedy took ill. The question would be why wasn't a bill introduced in Congress during that time? FOCA was introduced in '07. As of 5 years later it hadn't been reintroduced.
2
3
15
Replying to @AOC
I moved from CT to western MI earlier this year. Changed my voter registration. I looked it up today, and the Republican currently representing this district doesn't have a Dem opponent this year.
18
31
6
223
AOC doesn't have any plans to help with that, but she'll primary the fuck out of a sitting Dem.
17
2
2
23
Replying to @AOC
Not sure if you know this, but we need to pick up seats in the Senate in order to enact any legislation to codify Roe. Maybe instead of blaming Dems in 15btweet thread tweet you should be out there campaigning for Senate candidates. Better use of your time.
47
17
1
137
I am glad that @AOC takes the time to tweet solid steps. Winning votes requires clarity of plans with goals and objectives. The Dems are blowing up our phones with requests for $$ despite how often we donate. It angers me.
1
9
137
Replying to @AOC
Christian conservatives were able to strike down Roe without expanding the court or restraining judicial review. Strategy to bring it back needs to be the same as the one that took it away. It will take years and possibly decades.
25
19
Thats not entirely true. McConnell changed the fillibuster rules for federal judges so they no longer needed 60 votes just simple majority. Its how they git 3 justices confirmed & 225 federal appeals Judges 14 of which were ruled unqualified by the ABA
8
2
1
39
Replying to @AOC
Thank you for this bit of tough love. One Senate race that will deliver a vote to kill the filibuster and codify Roe is if @FrankenforIowa defeats @ChuckGrassley, which he has a decent chance to do. #IASen
5
29
1
143
Another Senate race that will deliver a vote to kill the filibuster and codify Roe is #PASen @JohnFetterman against that doctor from New Jersey, or Istanbul, or wherever he’s living now.
6
25
123