Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

1/"...witness testimony will soon begin, a clear signal that the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, is nearing a decision about whether to charge Mr. Trump" for his role in paying hush money to a porn star during his 2016 presidential campaign, nytimes.com/2023/01/30/nyreg…
71
366
10
1,723
2/ "On Monday, one of the witnesses was seen with his lawyer entering the building in Lower Manhattan where the grand jury is sitting. The witness, David Pecker, is the former publisher of The National Enquirer, the tabloid that helped broker the deal with...Stormy Daniels."
18
161
1
945
3/ "The prosecutors have also begun contacting officials from Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign...& in a sign that they want to corroborate these witness accounts, the prosecutors recently subpoenaed phone records & other documents that might shed light on the episode." Will be wild.
18
118
862
4/ Neither a prosecution nor a conviction is a sure thing. Michael Cohen's testimony will be essential but likely not sufficient to prove Trump's guilt. Prosecutors would like cooperation from Trump's CFO Alan Weisselberg, who has refused to implicate Trump personally so far.
36
123
3
646
Fail to see how this is a difficult case to prove especially after the Cohen conviction. This case could have been filed the day after Trump left office. Instead we've waited 740 days and still counting. Also where is the DoJ on this? MIA as usual.
1
2
16
Replying to @AverageSavant @JoyceWhiteVance
Unnerving to think the NYT thinks it's legal to pay hush money to influence a presidential election as long as records are not falsified.

Jan 30, 2023 · 6:53 PM UTC
1
5