Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

Staged photo of declassified papers protected by the U.S. Secret Service. Nothing was available digitally - like Hillary had. Stop just swallowing the government’s constant spin. Do journalism.
Maggie Haberman
 @maggieNYT
31 Aug 2022
Our first cut at the DOJ filing, a remarkable document that affirms our reporting over the last three weeks and finally shows the statement a Trump lawyer (said by sources to be Christina Bobb) signed @charlie_savage @alanfeuer @glennthrush nytimes.com/2022/08/31/us/po…
1,267
1,883
102
6,359
Replying to @RichardGrenell
Every president going back to Washington had "state secrets" materials in their private residence after they left office.

Aug 31, 2022 · 1:08 PM UTC

29
3
33
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
No. Not every President is taking highly sensitive national security documents home - when they are out of office - and then refusing to return the classified information when asked.
12
1
84
The documents are declassified if he said they are declassified.
29
1
8
more replies
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
Did any of them refuse to give them back after being asked for over a year including getting a grand jury subpoeana? Even if he "declassified" the documents, that doesn't mean that whatever information they held wasn't important and vital to national security. Right?
3
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
No, they didn't.
2
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
Every president? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
1
5
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
Name one. See also
1
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
1
5
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
Completely not true.
2
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
'Everybody does it'? We've moved on from 'never happened' and 'they're all declassified anyway'?
2
Replying to @HankVenture5 @RichardGrenell
This is wrong, but on another note - most presidents were allowed to keep their security clearance by the following administration. Not quite the case for 45.
1
Load more