Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.
I write Popular Information, an independent newsletter dedicated to accountability journalism. judd@popular.info | Signal/Text: 202-599-7124 | DMs open
Washington, DC
Joined July 2008
- Tweets 72,350
- Following 1,340
- Followers 558,358
- Likes 4,868
Pinned Tweet
Hi Twitter:
I'm launching a new political newsletter called Popular Information.
It's for people who give a damn.
It would be awesome if you would try it out and let me know what you think.
You can sign up at popular.info.
Thanks!
-- Judd
1,452
3,069
344
8,474
Unfortunately for Trump and his allies, completely losing your shit is generally not an effective legal defense to felony criminal charges
14
55
3
438
Soros donated $1 million dollars to @ColorOfChange, a group that supports supports progressive prosecutors.
@ColorofChange later spent some money supporting Alvin Bragg
But the idea that Bragg has significant connections to Soros is bunk
22
83
10
424
How was the indictment "manufactured"?
It wasn't Bragg who decided to pay Stormy Daniels $130,000 in hush money and then falsify business records as part of the cover-up.
It is beyond belief that District Attorney Alvin Bragg has indicted a former President and current presidential candidate for pure political gain. Arresting a presidential candidate on a manufactured basis should not happen in America.
Show this thread
22
122
4
673
This is a really good point.
Why should prosecutors waste their time with presidential candidates falsifying business records to conceal 6-figure hush money payments when they could be prosecuting people for a stealing a bottle of Tylenol?
Eric Trump: I went into literally CVS yesterday and you can’t buy Tylenol because it’s locked behind these glass counters… but yet their attention is going after Donald Trump
172
641
43
3,428
WSJ: "Manhattan prosecutors investigating Donald Trump’s role in paying hush money to a porn star also have been examining a $150,000 payment to a former Playboy model who alleged that she had an affair with the former president"
wsj.com/articles/trump-grand…
6
50
6
178
At least Bragg got more votes than his opponent. That's something Trump has never done in a general election.
Alvin Bragg's indictment of the former President is a petty act by somebody who was elected with 211,000 votes. His charge doesn't actually exist in the law, and even if it did, it would be beyond the statute of limitations.
invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=ybEfeC1C…
8
56
2
452
NOTE: You'll hear a lot of people say that charging someone with falsifying business records in New York as a felony is abnormal and Bragg is resorting to a novel legal theory to get Trump.
This is false.
FELONY CHARGES FOR FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IS QUITE COMMON IN NY
10
253
5
1,172
Receipts: scribd.com/document/63265017…
1
58
1
205
Do Trump supporters actually believe Trump didn't have an affair with Stormy Daniels?
Or are they just are cool being lied to repeatedly?
117
71
9
786
Yes, it is sad that the former president funneled 130K in hush money through a shell company to a woman who says she had an affair with him in order to keep the information from the public before election day, then falsified business records to try to cover his tracks
32
743
10
3,659
11. On October 25, 2016, two weeks before Election Day, Daniels' attorney told Cohen that he was canceling the deal and Daniels would shop her story to media outlets
This was dire
Daniels' story would go public AND she could also reveal Trump's botched pay-off effort
3
112
977
12. Had the truth emerged in October 2016, it could have played a decisive role in an election determined by about 70,000 votes across a handful of states
Instead, Cohen drew down 130K from a home equity credit line & transferred it to a shell company which paid Daniels' lawyer
13
158
6
1,134
13. There was a great deal of effort to obscure Trump's involvement with the payment. In the non-disclosure agreement itself, Trump was referred to by a pseudonym, David Dennison (DD). A separate side agreement identified Dennison as Trump.
popular.info/p/why-stormy-da…
4
135
6
970
14. A few days later, Trump won the presidency.
Trump and Cohen then conspired to hide the reimbursement for Cohen's payment to Daniels.
Cohen submitted fake invoices to the Trump Organization.
Trump himself signed the checks.
4
150
3
1,057
15. On April 5, 2018, Trump was asked if he knew anything about the payments from Cohen to Daniels. He claimed he knew nothing.
4
110
938
16. Now, it's up to Bragg's office to prove that this scheme was a violation of New York law.
We do not yet know the details of the charges or how Bragg will make his case
But Trump's conduct was not unmeaningful, and efforts to hold him legally accountable are not outrageous.
4
108
1
1,140
17. Trump schemed to conceal relevant information from the voting public in the days before the election, engaged in an elaborate coverup, and then lied about his involvement.
This deceit may have changed the course of history.
popular.info/p/why-stormy-da…
11
212
9
1,388
18. Thank you for making it to the end of this thread.
For UPDATES on the indictment and prosecution of Donald J. Trump in plain language, subscribe to Popular Information
It's free to sign up
popular.info/subscribe
32
81
2
988