If @GitHub (Microsoft) truly believes copilot isn't infringing on anyone's work, I want to offer them a chance to prove it: I'll donate $50k to a charity of their choice (or @EFF if we can't agree) if they release a Copilot version trained solely on Windows kernel source. 1/
Hi. I know you’re excited about copilot. GitHub scraped your code. And they plan to charge you for copilot after you help train it further. It’s truly disappointing to watch people cheer at having their work and time exploited by a company worth billions.
Show this thread
46
819
63
2,607
This isn't a joke. It would be amazingly helpful for device driver developers. This in turn would ostensibly benefit Windows users through fewer BSODs. Add the charity money in and there's literally NO REASON not to do it. 2/

3:48 PM · Jul 3, 2021

1
21
0
404
So let's set some ground rules: Independent verification that the newly released model is only trained on kernel source It's the full kernel source, from all versions (leave Win2k out if you want due to that pesky Java thing) All kernel drivers owned by MSFT are included too 3/
4
13
0
292
No shenanigans The custom copilot version is published before July 31st If they want, I'll even present the person in @Microsoft who made it happen with the charity check at their Blackhat party so they can milk maximum PR out of it. 4/
1
8
0
295
If you are similarly convinced that this is a good idea, reply with your own pledge so it gets harder for @Microsoft and @github to ignore this. Of course they're free to ignore, but that certainly doesn't speak well for the "it's just a model" argument... /FIN
9
14
1
363