Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

Staged photo of declassified papers protected by the U.S. Secret Service. Nothing was available digitally - like Hillary had. Stop just swallowing the government’s constant spin. Do journalism.
Maggie Haberman
 @maggieNYT
31 Aug 2022
Our first cut at the DOJ filing, a remarkable document that affirms our reporting over the last three weeks and finally shows the statement a Trump lawyer (said by sources to be Christina Bobb) signed @charlie_savage @alanfeuer @glennthrush nytimes.com/2022/08/31/us/po…
1,267
1,883
102
6,359
You’re a disgrace.
12
1
79
Replying to @todgoldberg
I take your comment to mean “I’m so angry that you make a good point that all I can do is attack you personally”.

Aug 31, 2022 · 4:48 PM UTC

61
15
1
269
Replying to @RichardGrenell
No, it means you know the law, you know it well, and you think it doesn’t apply to your confederates, and that’s disgraceful.
5
1
18
more replies
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
Really? Because most of us took it as pointing out what a disgrace you are.
3
13
more replies
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
It is not a good point. The Secret Service does not protect documents. That is not their mission, but of course you know that.
1
17
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
Do you..as a former acting director of ODNI during the Trump administration...have personal knowledge or involvement in Trump's possession of these materials? You probably should get a really good lawyer
1
12
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
Going down with the ship.
7
GIF
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
Typical Lib response to the Truth, Attack! They never have any kind of legitimate retort!
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
You seem kind of…on edge. It might be a good time for you to find a lawyer, pay the retainer, so that when the investigation gets around to the DNI, you might be able to get a decent one. Might be a rush on them if you wait.
1
2
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
No, I think he means that your words and actions are disgraceful. Don't overthink this.
3
Replying to @RichardGrenell @todgoldberg
No it was very clear, you made no piont other then to show what a disgrace you are.
3
Load more