Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

20. The committee justified her suspensions internally by claiming her posts encouraged online harassment of “hospitals and medical providers” by insinuating “that gender-affirming healthcare is equivalent to child abuse or grooming.”
994
9,396
517
58,543
21. Compare this to what happened when Raichik herself was doxxed on November 21, 2022. A photo of her home with her address was posted in a tweet that has garnered more than 10,000 likes.
912
9,638
372
58,747
22. When Raichik told Twitter that her address had been disseminated she says Twitter Support responded with this message: "We reviewed the reported content, and didn't find it to be in violation of the Twitter rules." No action was taken. The doxxing tweet is still up.
1,325
12,084
743
63,604
23. In internal Slack messages, Twitter employees spoke of using technicalities to restrict the visibility of tweets and subjects. Here’s Yoel Roth, Twitter’s then Global Head of Trust & Safety, in a direct message to a colleague in early 2021:
470
8,304
306
48,862
24. Six days later, in a direct message with an employee on the Health, Misinformation, Privacy, and Identity research team, Roth requested more research to support expanding “non-removal policy interventions like disabling engagements and deamplification/visibility filtering.”
719
8,346
514
47,875
25. Roth wrote: “The hypothesis underlying much of what we’ve implemented is that if exposure to, e.g., misinformation directly causes harm, we should use remediations that reduce exposure, and limiting the spread/virality of content is a good way to do that.”
491
7,176
265
45,496
26. He added: “We got Jack on board with implementing this for civic integrity in the near term, but we’re going to need to make a more robust case to get this into our repertoire of policy remediations – especially for other policy domains.”
932
7,737
483
46,846
27. There is more to come on this story, which was reported by @abigailshrier @shellenbergermd @nelliebowles @isaacgrafstein and the team The Free Press @thefp. Keep up with this unfolding story here and at our brand new website: thefp.com.
627
9,221
267
51,171
28. The authors have broad and expanding access to Twitter’s files. The only condition we agreed to was that the material would first be published on Twitter.
744
6,951
209
49,895
29. We're just getting started on our reporting. Documents cannot tell the whole story here. A big thank you to everyone who has spoken to us so far. If you are a current or former Twitter employee, we'd love to hear from you. Please write to: tips@thefp.com
768
7,993
180
55,232
30. Watch @mtaibbi for the next installment.

Dec 9, 2022 · 1:40 AM UTC

2,477
7,788
276
57,495
Replying to @bariweiss @mtaibbi
The next installment of what? Another dull recitation of normal enforcement of standard Twitter TOS, in a multi-tweet thread, with zero revelatory content? cc @yoyoel @WSJeditor @nytopinion
75
13
2
150
Replying to @bariweiss @mtaibbi
Just a thought @elonmusk may be a great idea to let @mirandadevine into this mix.
2
5
1
63
Replying to @bariweiss @mtaibbi
Wait, this is it??
71
5
123
Did you read the whole thread? No, this is not all it is. Moreover, this is pretty damn bad, and if you don’t think so, you’re a fascist.
3
7
Replying to @bariweiss @mtaibbi
Great work tonite - question on the VF revelation - were any journalists targeted in addition to the conservative voices you revealed?
13
17
109
Replying to @bariweiss @mtaibbi
….is this not what he said he was going to do?
31
19
6
234
And you’re saying you approve of this? What if he decides your tweets are the hateful ones? Still OK with you?
17
27