Here’s how Dems can + must do more than wait for an election. Let’s start w/ why: - 7 of the 9 justices were appointed by a party that hasn’t won a popular vote more than once in 30 years - 1 of those seats was stolen - Several lied to Congress to secure their appointment…
6,587
45,660
5,700
229,251
- 1 justice’s family (Thomas) was paid by right wing groups for years and he never disclosed it, violating Federal law - Same justice’s spouse participated in 1/6 and he used his SCOTUS seat to vote to keep potential info related to his wife from investigators in Congress…
633
11,559
300
83,224
- 2 justices stand very credibly accused of sexual assault And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Election or not, the Supreme Court has a legitimacy crisis and the public reaffirms it: 75% of the US public reports lacking confidence in SCOTUS, & those numbers were *pre-Roe ruling*
702
7,876
177
68,124
In a legitimacy crisis, the solution Biden + Dem leaders must offer can’t just be one of voting, but of statute & authority. Compared to Exec + Leg branch, checks on Court overreach and misconduct are little to none. Leaders must share their plans for Roe AND a rogue court.
270
7,170
212
59,221
Past Presidents, from Lincoln to FDR, understood the dangerous stakes of allowing an unchecked Court overreach its authority and threaten our democracy. Lincoln ignored the court to issue the emancipation proclamation. FDR, in the plunges of the Great Depression, also sought…
265
6,091
155
53,624
to confront the Court’s structure (and core gerontocracy problem of lifetime appointments) via public appeal. While he did not succeed, that check came from the ppl & Congress, NOT scotus. The ruling is Roe, but the crisis is democracy. Leaders must share specific plans for both
186
4,993
93
50,842
The President & Dem leaders can no longer get away with familiar tactics of “committees” and “studies” to avoid tackling our crises head-on anymore: - Restrain judicial review - Open clinics on federal lands - Court expansion - Expand Fed access/awareness of pill abortions - etc
670
9,667
544
67,980
For the moments when we DO insist on elections, we must be PRECISE with what we need and we will do with that power: How many seats does the party need to Codify Roe? Dems must SAY THAT. Not just “go vote” or “give us $6 to win.” That is demoralizing, losing, unfocused nonsense
893
14,678
1,000
95,518
Dem leaders must tell voters the plan: What’s the *actual* need? Which specific seats are we focused on? WHAT votes do we need & WHERE (what states + races?) And, what’s the return? What is Biden/Congress ACTUALLY willing+able to do at 52/60 seats? Be honest. Details motivate
901
10,773
720
79,731
Replying to @AOC
the issue is that being honest would reveal the fact that they don't care to do anything about this issue because if they did they would have done something when Obama had the votes to codify roe v wade 8 years ago

Jun 25, 2022 · 6:00 PM UTC

14
3
69
Replying to @cahcd2 @AOC
BHO had 60 in the Senate for about 2 months: after Franken came in and before Kennedy took ill. The question would be why wasn't a bill introduced in Congress during that time? FOCA was introduced in '07. As of 5 years later it hadn't been reintroduced.
2
3
15
Replying to @cahcd2 @AOC
Right? What tangibly have they done for abortion other than fundraise
2
2
Replying to @cahcd2 @AOC
60 Democrats isn't the same as 60 votes to codify Roe. There were anti-abortion Democrats in the Senate.
3
Replying to @cahcd2 @AOC
If facts paid the rent you’d be on the street.
Replying to @cahcd2 @AOC
Maybe if you knew what you were talking about people would take you seriously.
Replying to @cahcd2 @AOC
Simply not true. He never had 60 votes.