Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

So Judge Dearie (the special master tasked w/reviewing the docs Trump stole from the govt) refused to play Trump’s games, telling him (in substance) to put up or shut up. Now Cannon swoops back in & says (in substance), Trump doesn’t have to put up & Judge Dearie should shut up.
New: The judge in the Mar-a-Lago docs case sided with Trump in his objection to the special master's proposal that he verify the govt's inventory log of seized items, and extended the deadline for the review into mid-December. More to come. storage.courtlistener.com/re…
Show this thread

Sep 29, 2022 · 8:56 PM UTC

1,132
3,485
264
8,359
Replying to @glennkirschner2
This is truly infuriating. 😡
4
3
117
Glenn, Teri says FOJ filed a Notice of Appeal. I haven’t seen it. Have you? @glennkirschner2
Replying to @Teri_Kanefield
People are asking the recourse. The DOJ has filed a notice of appeal. Remember, this order does not include the documents marked classified, so these delays are not stopping the most important part of the criminal and national security investigations.
Show this thread
3
7
56
Replying to @glennkirschner2
“Judge” Cannon is making a mockery of Trump appointed judges and Republicans here.
4
18
1
226
Replying to @glennkirschner2
God, she's not even pretending. She's a MAGA judge and she's going to rule as such.
5
16
1
205
Replying to @glennkirschner2
The DOJ can conduct its investigation. That's the important thing. None of this other nonsense gets in the way of that.
2
14
252
Maybe. But she isn’t done ruling on this case. Who knows what other way she may impede it. It’s not a good sign. The real way to short circuit her impact is to get Trump indicted as quickly as possible. But I don’t have much confidence in Garland moving quickly.
4
14
1
138
Replying to @glennkirschner2
As predicted, she will muck things up to protect Trump and slow down the investigation/court proceedings. She is eminently unqualified and should be removed from the bench. Whatever means that exist to do so should begin immediately (but they wont, will they?)
4
17
127
Replying to @glennkirschner2
At this point, should the DOJ just go back to the 11th Circuit and ask them to throw away the entire Loose Cannon clusterfuck? There was no need for a special master to begin with and national-security outweighs hurt feelings.
5
39
340
Just go over everyone.. and indict him.
2
14
1
210