Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

@judgeluttig @judgeluttig
Joined October 2020
  • Tweets 411
  • Following 421
  • Followers 72,686
2 Photos and videos
The Solicitor General has filed the views of the United States in Moore v. Harper (Harper I) on the question whether there is a “final judgment” before the Supreme Court, in light of the NC SC’s grant of rehearing in Harper II.
5
46
4
199
I don’t recall a brief by the Solicitor General so ill-reasoned and confused, so convoluted and obtuse.
1
7
5
88
All toward the end of telling the Supreme Court that the Solicitor General of the United States “is not aware of any of the Court’s 'final judgment' precedents addressing" what the SG says are the “unusual” circumstances of Moore.
1
5
60
And this, after the Court asked the parties to brief the universe of the Court’s “final judgment” precedents analyzed by the Court itself in Cox Broadcasting, some of which clearly apply to the circumstances in Moore -- circumstances that are neither unusual nor uncommon at all.
1
5
56
The SG’s jarring argument of non sequitur is that the absence of precedent to apply in the circumstances of Moore "makes it difficult to conclude that the state court has entered a 'final judgment' reviewable" by the Court. Not "whether," but "that."
1
6
54
But "[the Supreme Court] could reasonably reach a different conclusion," the SG offers.
1
3
47
The SG also confuses “final judgment” and “mootness” as they are implicated by the NC SC’s grant of rehearing in Harper II, the latter of which the Supreme Court did not even ask about.
1
3
50
Potential mootness caused by a state court's pending decision is relevant under some of Cox Broadcasting's exceptions to the "final judgment" rule and strongly supports the conclusion that the Supreme Court continues to have "final judgment" jurisdiction in Moore today.
1
1
47
The same considerations of potential mootness that counsel that there is still a "final judgment" in Moore today would counsel that Moore would not be moot, even were the NC SC eventually to overrule Harper I.
1
2
45
Notwithstanding, the SG also incorrectly argues not only that the possibility that the NC SC might overrule Harper I means that there is no "final judgment" in Harper I today, but also that Harper I should be dismissed as moot if eventually overruled by the NC SC in Harper II.
1
3
44
Though here again, the SG is at pains to offer that the Supreme Court "could reasonably reach a different conclusion."
1
6
74
These are the views of the United States in the most important case for American democracy in our history.
5
12
1
119
This fascinating NYT piece by Noam Chomsky, Ian Roberts, and Jeffrey Watumull, is itself an exemplar of intelligence that artificial intelligence will never be intelligent enough to replicate. Let alone could artificial intelligence ever replicate true human brilliance.
19
119
3
566
“True intelligence is demonstrated in the ability to think and express improbable but insightful things. True intelligence is also capable of moral thinking."
1
25
1
161
"This means constraining the otherwise limitless creativity of our minds with a set of ethical principles that determines what ought and ought not to be (and of course subjecting those principles themselves to creative criticism)”
1
23
1
142
nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opini…

Opinion | Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT

The most prominent strain of A.I. encodes a flawed conception of language and knowledge.

nytimes.com
10
71
5
222
and also @OMarkarova @AdamKinzinger, @GeoffDuncanGA, and Ambassador John Bolton,
3
10
139
@BillKristol, @davidfrum, @SykesCharlie, Arthur Brooks, @monacharen, @RadioFreeTom @MarkHertling, @BarbaraComstock, @AmandaTylerBJC,
2
6
2
131
@amandacarpenter, @SarahLongwell25, and the inimitable @whignewtons
1
8
157
Thank you so much for all that you and Principles First are doing to right America’s listing ship of state. We are all immensely grateful to you and @Principles_1st.
10
20
289
Show this thread
Load more