This is a detour from the main argument of the piece but peer review does seem like a really odd idea if the goal is to advance new frontiers in knowledge.
experimentalhistory.substack…
Here’s a piece actually focused on that topic — it’s odd to take up a lot of very skilled people’s time on a practice whose benefits are so questionable.
liamkofibright.com/uploads/4…
Separate from the policy details (which are mostly good, just limited in their impact) I do think it's significant to see the White House embracing @KAErdmann Thought after years when the conventional wisdom was dominated by "housing bubble" stuff.
whitehouse.gov/briefing-room…
Technically, yes, I did see The Northman recently.
But more to the point last fall I read an edited volume on the Proto-Indo-Europeans and I assume Robert Eggers also read the thing in here about transforming into wolves.
amazon.com/dp/B07W7Z8J2L/ref…
Denmark tried to specifically match refugees with local labor shortages (including providing training) and it worked pretty well.
nber.org/papers/w29781
Academics can get overly precious about their citations but the point is that the NYT explicitly claimed nobody has ever done this before — if that’s not true then they shouldn’t have said it!