Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

The infamous NYT’s story affected Steel’s behavior
155
1,994
264
3,899
Simpson's testimony lines up with earlier reports by @KimSengupta07, @DavidCornDC and @RealRussBaker: Steele didn't know who he could trust in the FBI and even thought there might be a coverup.
Julie (Post.news and 🐳 Spoutible.com) @nihonmama
14 Jan 2017
Replying to @nihonmama
Wow. Steele believed that the FBI was engaged in a coverup. Did Dems know this when they confronted Comey today? independent.co.uk/news/world…
3
49
1
94
Replying to @nihonmama @samstein @KimSengupta07 @DavidCornDC @RealRussBaker
So this begs the question yet again: Did "Law enforcement officials" (FBI?) who were sources for the erroneous Eric Lichtblau + Steven Lee Meyers NYT story spin/divert/dupe them, or were they not in the know? #FusionGPS

Jan 9, 2018 · 8:36 PM UTC

5
22
2
62
Replying to @nihonmama @samstein @KimSengupta07 @DavidCornDC
Great question. Need to find out!
1
1
2
Thanks Russ — hope you're good. While everyone else is chasing their tails, hopefully you can find out. I've always believed that NYT got spun...
3
Replying to @nihonmama @samstein @KimSengupta07 @DavidCornDC @RealRussBaker
We know some of them were friends with and leaking to Giuliani. It seems clear they were rabidly pro-Trump (and there were articles to that effect --supposed to be the NY office). They knew what they were doing. Corrupt :(
3
14
1
69
We sure do know, in big part due to the late, great @BarrettNation, who exposed a fifth column inside the FBI right before he died. thedailybeast.com/meet-donal…
1
21
2
28
more replies
Replying to @nihonmama @samstein @KimSengupta07 @DavidCornDC @RealRussBaker
Lichtblau had an agenda. law enforcement can't do anything about that. NYT brass and other journalists could. They decided not too. Instead assumed NYT vetting process was good notwithstanding all of their prior failures
1
3
3
Your assertion that Lichtblau had an agenda ≠ fact. What we don't know is whether his sources intentionally provided disinfo. We now know Steele wasn't told about the FBI's CI investigation; were Lichtblau + Meyer sources in the dark too? Possible.
Julie (Post.news and 🐳 Spoutible.com) @nihonmama
9 Jan 2018
Replying to @nihonmama
Now it adds up. "He was concerned. He wanted the FBI to do something about it. He thought the FBI wasn't doing anything about it. We now know they had a secret counterintelligence investigation going on, apparently they didn't tell Steele" nitter.fdn.fr/DeadlineWH/statu… #FusionGPS
2
2
4
more replies
Today's NBCNews piece by @kailanikm ("McConnell ‘watered down’ Russia warning in 2016") also points to a April 2017 @nytimes with a big point that's gotten lost in Trump Russia coverage: initially, the CIA and FBI were split on the aims of the Russian cyberattacks. 1/
1
5
8
When Harry Reid wrote to Comey in AUG, 2016, neither he nor other members of Congress knew that the FBI had launched an investigation into Trump/Russia. Further, (some) FBI officials didn't come around to the CIA's view until the "election approached". Was that by late Oct? 2/
1
4
9
more replies
The question is finally answered. "when The New York Times tried to assess the state of the investigation in October 2016, law enforcement officials cautioned against drawing any conclusions, resulting in a story that significantly played down the case."
Dan Diamond
 @ddiamond
16 May 2018
Blockbuster NYT story on Russia investigation says that cautious FBI sat on facts that could have “devastated” Trump campaign in 2016. nytimes.com/2018/05/16/us/po…
1
6
1
7
more replies