Here’s how Dems can + must do more than wait for an election. Let’s start w/ why: - 7 of the 9 justices were appointed by a party that hasn’t won a popular vote more than once in 30 years - 1 of those seats was stolen - Several lied to Congress to secure their appointment…
6,587
45,660
5,699
229,256
- 1 justice’s family (Thomas) was paid by right wing groups for years and he never disclosed it, violating Federal law - Same justice’s spouse participated in 1/6 and he used his SCOTUS seat to vote to keep potential info related to his wife from investigators in Congress…
633
11,557
300
83,233
- 2 justices stand very credibly accused of sexual assault And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Election or not, the Supreme Court has a legitimacy crisis and the public reaffirms it: 75% of the US public reports lacking confidence in SCOTUS, & those numbers were *pre-Roe ruling*
702
7,876
177
68,130
In a legitimacy crisis, the solution Biden + Dem leaders must offer can’t just be one of voting, but of statute & authority. Compared to Exec + Leg branch, checks on Court overreach and misconduct are little to none. Leaders must share their plans for Roe AND a rogue court.
270
7,171
212
59,226
Past Presidents, from Lincoln to FDR, understood the dangerous stakes of allowing an unchecked Court overreach its authority and threaten our democracy. Lincoln ignored the court to issue the emancipation proclamation. FDR, in the plunges of the Great Depression, also sought…
266
6,091
155
53,624
to confront the Court’s structure (and core gerontocracy problem of lifetime appointments) via public appeal. While he did not succeed, that check came from the ppl & Congress, NOT scotus. The ruling is Roe, but the crisis is democracy. Leaders must share specific plans for both
186
4,993
94
50,847
The President & Dem leaders can no longer get away with familiar tactics of “committees” and “studies” to avoid tackling our crises head-on anymore: - Restrain judicial review - Open clinics on federal lands - Court expansion - Expand Fed access/awareness of pill abortions - etc
670
9,667
544
67,983
For the moments when we DO insist on elections, we must be PRECISE with what we need and we will do with that power: How many seats does the party need to Codify Roe? Dems must SAY THAT. Not just “go vote” or “give us $6 to win.” That is demoralizing, losing, unfocused nonsense
893
14,681
1,000
95,518
Dem leaders must tell voters the plan: What’s the *actual* need? Which specific seats are we focused on? WHAT votes do we need & WHERE (what states + races?) And, what’s the return? What is Biden/Congress ACTUALLY willing+able to do at 52/60 seats? Be honest. Details motivate
901
10,776
720
79,728
Replying to @AOC
Christian conservatives were able to strike down Roe without expanding the court or restraining judicial review. Strategy to bring it back needs to be the same as the one that took it away. It will take years and possibly decades.

Jun 25, 2022 · 6:54 PM UTC

25
19
Replying to @robcsegal @AOC
Thats not entirely true. McConnell changed the fillibuster rules for federal judges so they no longer needed 60 votes just simple majority. Its how they git 3 justices confirmed & 225 federal appeals Judges 14 of which were ruled unqualified by the ABA
8
2
1
39
They're just making excuses for Democratic inaction
This tweet is unavailable
You are exactly right. It’s simple…VOTE every time, down the ballot!!!
Replying to @robcsegal @AOC
They *absolutely* restrained judicial review. I'd also argue that flat out thievery of two Supreme Court Justices is not a good "strategy," unless we're just going to give up on this whole democracy thing.