Notre instance Nitter est hébergée dans l'Union Européenne. Les lois de l'UE s'y appliquent. Conformément à la Directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins dans la société de l'information, « Les actes de reproduction provisoires visés à l'article 2, qui sont transitoires ou accessoires et constituent une partie intégrante et essentielle d'un procédé technique et dont l'unique finalité est de permettre : une transmission dans un réseau entre tiers par un intermédiaire, […] d'une oeuvre ou d'un objet protégé, et qui n'ont pas de signification économique indépendante, sont exemptés du droit de reproduction. » Aussi, toutes les demandes de retrait doivent être envoyées à Twitter, car nous n'avons aucun contrôle sur les données qu'ils ont sur leurs serveurs.

Judge Cannon is clearly wrong, but she’s a sideshow now that the Court of Appeals has lifted her injunction with respect to the classified documents. On the eve of her stupidly extended deadline, DOJ should indict Trump and render her delays and game playing moot.
So Judge Dearie (the special master tasked w/reviewing the docs Trump stole from the govt) refused to play Trump’s games, telling him (in substance) to put up or shut up. Now Cannon swoops back in & says (in substance), Trump doesn’t have to put up & Judge Dearie should shut up.

Sep 30, 2022 · 1:52 AM UTC

622
4,550
226
15,350
Replying to @tribelaw
Y E S !!!!
1
23
Replying to @tribelaw
Yes, indict him...
29
Replying to @tribelaw
Thank God the court of appeals lifted the injunction.
5
1
50
Replying to @tribelaw
She should be disbarred
1
4
67
Wouldn't rovs her from the bench. She doesn't need a law license for that
1
Replying to @tribelaw
I keep wondering if this doesn't help the DOJ - now that 11th Cir let them have the relevant docs again - because it creates a reason they haven't indicted. And presumably they don't want to indict at the top yet, because there is more investigation to complete.
2
3
14
If they don't indict now they're opportunity for Congressional support will disappear in November. Now or never.
4
1
19
Replying to @tribelaw
Thank you. Just a layperson here but it has seemed obvious from the moment they seized the classified docs at MAL he should be indicted. If he has a valid explanation he can provide it at trial.
1
22
1
166
Somehow, it’s no coincidence to me that the initials for Mar-a-Lago are “MAL.” 😆 I never considered that until I saw your post!
2
5
58